Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
3.
Nat Commun ; 13(1): 6025, 2022 10 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2062212

ABSTRACT

Infection with SARS-CoV-2 variant Omicron is considered to be less severe than infection with variant Delta, with rarer occurrence of severe disease requiring intensive care. Little information is available on comorbid factors, clinical conditions and specific viral mutational patterns associated with the severity of variant Omicron infection. In this multicenter prospective cohort study, patients consecutively admitted for severe COVID-19 in 20 intensive care units in France between December 7th 2021 and May 1st 2022 were included. Among 259 patients, we show that the clinical phenotype of patients infected with variant Omicron (n = 148) is different from that in those infected with variant Delta (n = 111). We observe no significant relationship between Delta and Omicron variant lineages/sublineages and 28-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.68 [0.35-1.32]; p = 0.253). Among Omicron-infected patients, 43.2% are immunocompromised, most of whom have received two doses of vaccine or more (85.9%) but display a poor humoral response to vaccination. The mortality rate of immunocompromised patients infected with variant Omicron is significantly higher than that of non-immunocompromised patients (46.9% vs 26.2%; p = 0.009). In patients infected with variant Omicron, there is no association between specific sublineages (BA.1/BA.1.1 (n = 109) and BA.2 (n = 21)) or any viral genome polymorphisms/mutational profile and 28-day mortality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Critical Illness , Humans , Phenotype , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/genetics
4.
Jpn J Infect Dis ; 74(4): 367-368, 2021 Jul 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1380103

ABSTRACT

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is currently a major worldwide concern. Guidelines have been issued regarding precautions for healthcare workers caring for SARS-CoV-2-infected patients. Despite accurate observance of infection control measures, including contact precautions, we encountered an OXA-23-producing Acinetobacter baumannii outbreak in 5 intensive care units of 10 beds each in our tertiary care teaching hospital.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter Infections/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Acinetobacter baumannii/pathogenicity , Adult , Aged , Disease Outbreaks , Female , Health Personnel , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Tertiary Care Centers
5.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 132(5): 1009-1017, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1101154

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe EEG patterns of critical Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with suspicion of encephalopathy and test their association with clinical outcome. METHODS: EEG after discontinuation of sedation in all patients, and somesthesic evoked potentials and brainstem auditive evoked potentials when EEG did not show reactivity, were performed. Clinical outcome was assessed at day 7 and 14 after neurophysiological explorations. RESULTS: 33 patients were included for analysis. We found slowed background activity in 85% of cases, unreactive activity in 42% of cases, low-voltage activity in 21% of cases and rhythmic or periodic delta waves in 61% of cases. EEG epileptic events were never recorded. Clinical outcome at day 14 was associated with unreactive background activity and tended to be associated with rhythmic or periodic delta waves and with low-voltage activity. Results of multimodal evoked potentials were in favor of a preservation of central nervous system somatosensory and auditory functions. CONCLUSIONS: Among critical COVID-19 patients with abnormal arousal at discontinuation of sedation, EEG patterns consistent with encephalopathy are found and are predictive for short term clinical outcome. SIGNIFICANCE: The abnormal EEG with presence of periodic discharges and lack of reactivity could be related to encephalopathy linked to COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Arousal/physiology , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/physiopathology , Critical Care/methods , Electroencephalography/methods , Aged , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory/physiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
6.
7.
Crit Care Med ; 49(2): e191-e198, 2021 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-889603

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Treating acute respiratory failure in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 is challenging due to the lack of knowledge of the underlying pathophysiology. Hypoxemia may be explained in part by the loss of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. The present study assessed the effect of almitrine, a selective pulmonary vasoconstrictor, on arterial oxygenation in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome. DESIGN: Single-center retrospective observational study. SETTING: ICU of Lille Teaching Hospital, France, from February 27, 2020, to April 14, 2020. PATIENTS: Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia confirmed by positive reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction for severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 and acute respiratory distress syndrome according to Berlin definition. Data focused on clinicobiological features, ventilator settings, therapeutics, outcomes, and almitrine-related adverse events. INTERVENTIONS: Almitrine was considered in patients with severe hypoxemia (Pao2/Fio2 ratio < 150 mm Hg) in addition to the recommended therapies, at an hourly IV delivery of 10 µg/kg/min. Comparative blood gases were done before starting almitrine trial and immediately after the end of the infusion. A positive response to almitrine was defined by an increase of Pao2/Fio2 ratio greater than or equal to 20% at the end of the infusion. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 169 patients were enrolled. Thirty-two patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome received an almitrine infusion trial. In most cases, almitrine was infused in combination with inhaled nitric oxide (75%). Twenty-one patients (66%) were responders. The median Pao2/Fio2 ratio improvement was 39% (9-93%) and differs significantly between the responders and nonresponders (67% [39-131%] vs 6% [9-16%], respectively; p < 0.0001). The 28-day mortality rates were 47.6% and 63.6% (p = 0.39) for the responders and nonresponders, respectively. Hemodynamic parameters remained similar before and after the trial, not suggesting acute cor pulmonale. CONCLUSIONS: Almitrine infusion improved oxygenation in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome without adverse effects. In a multistep clinical approach to manage severe hypoxemia in this population, almitrine could be an interesting therapeutic option to counteract the loss of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and redistribute blood flow away from shunting zones.


Subject(s)
Almitrine/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/drug therapy , Respiratory System Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/complications , Critical Care/methods , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Gas Exchange/drug effects , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL